VeryDarkMan has doubled down on his position in the ongoing Ratel app controversy, making bold claims about ownership, control, and why he has chosen not to escalate the matter legally for now.
According to VDM, he holds the trademark rights and company ownership connected to the Ratel brand, giving him the legal authority to challenge any revenue generated from the app if he chooses to do so. He stated that formal communication has already been sent to Google, notifying the platform of his ownership claims.
VDM explained that, under trademark and corporate law, he could legally move to block the app, freeze associated accounts, or lay claim to funds generated through it. However, he says he has deliberately decided against taking that route.
“This isn’t about anger,” VDM suggested. “It’s about strategy.”
Rather than forcing a shutdown, he believes the app will struggle and eventually fail on its own, especially now that the ownership dispute is public knowledge. According to him, once the reality of the trademark situation became clear, the motivation behind pushing the app forward disappeared.
VDM also claimed that previous apps created by Blord failed to gain lasting traction, adding to his confidence that the Ratel app will not survive long-term without sustained commitment and clear ownership.
Despite insisting that any money generated from the app legally belongs to him, VDM says he is choosing patience over pressure, describing the situation as a lesson in branding, ownership, and understanding intellectual property.
For him, the dispute is no longer about proving a point it’s about letting structure, law, and time take their course.
Key takeaway:
In branding and tech, ownership isn’t decided by who launches first but by who understands the legal framework behind the name.
As the Ratel story continues to unfold, one thing is clear: this is no longer internet noise. It’s a real-world example of how trademarks, strategy, and restraint can be just as powerful as public influence.
0 Comments